Question
A contestant in a winter sporting event pushes a 45.0-kg block of ice across a frozen lake as shown in Figure 5.21(a). (a) Calculate the minimum force F he must exert to get the block moving. (b) What is the magnitude of its acceleration once it starts to move, if that force is maintained?
<b>Figure 5.21</b> A person (a) pushing, and (b) pulling, a block of ice across ice.
Figure 5.21 A person (a) pushing, and (b) pulling, a block of ice across ice.
Question by OpenStax is licensed under CC BY 4.0
Final Answer
  1. 50 N50\textrm{ N}
  2. 0.7 m/s20.7 \textrm{ m/s}^2

Solution video

OpenStax College Physics, Chapter 5, Problem 18 (Problems & Exercises)

OpenStax College Physics, Chapter 5, Problem 18 (PE) video thumbnail

In order to watch this solution you need to have a subscription.

Start free trial Log in
vote with a rating of votes with an average rating of .

Calculator Screenshots

  • OpenStax College Physics, Chapter 5, Problem 18 (PE) calculator screenshot 1
Video Transcript
This is College Physics Answers with Shaun Dychko. This person is pushing a block of ice on ice and we can find the coefficient's of static and kinetic friction from table [5.1]; static friction coefficient is 0.1 and the kinetic friction coefficient once it starts sliding is 0.03 and we are asked what minimum force do they need to apply in order to get the block just to begin moving? And so the type of friction involved there is static friction because the block is not yet moving. Now notice that the person is pushing down at this angle of 25 degrees with respect to horizontal. Doing so means that they are actually increasing the force downwards on the block... they are adding to the gravity because there's some y-component to their applied force and that in turn causes an increase in the normal force upwards and by increasing the normal force, they are increasing the static friction force. So we are going to consider the y-direction here and we'll figure out an expression that will involve this normal force that we will then use in our consideration of the horizontal direction, the x-direction, which we'll do in the second step. So we have written down all the things that we know of course: the mass being 45 kilograms, okay. In the y-direction, Newton's second law says that the normal force upwards minus all the other forces downwards has to equal mass times acceleration but there's no acceleration vertically and so we'll just say 0 here. And then we can make substitution's for each of these terms here: we have gravity is mass of the block times g and then the y-component of this person's force is the force multiplied by sin of 25 degrees because this y-component is the opposite leg of this this right triangle here. So we take sin of the angle, multiply it by the hypotenuse to get the opposite leg and then we make substitution's for both those terms and we call this equation number 1. So this is the normal force upwards minus gravity downwards minus the component of the applied force downwards equals zero. And then considering the x-direction, we have that the x-component of the applied force by the person to the right so it's positive minus the friction force to the left all equals zero. This is just the border between when there is acceleration or is not and we are using the maximum static friction force here. So the x-component of the applied force is the force multiplied by cos Θ because we are finding the adjacent leg of this right triangle now and multiplying cos Θ by the hypotenuse to get the x-component. And then the maximum static friction force is equal to the coefficient of static friction multiplied by the normal force and so we make substitution's for each of these terms using what we have written here and we'll call this equation number 2. So we have Fcos Θ minus μ sF N equals 0. So we have two equations and there are a couple of things that we don't know but we can make a substitution from equation 1 and solve it instead for F N and plug that in up here and then we'll be able to figure out what this applied force needs to be. So here's equation 1 written again but version b because we rearranged it a bit: we have added mg to both sides and added Fsin Θ to both sides and then we end up with normal force is mg plus Fsin Θ. And so then we rewrite equation 2, we'll call it version b where we have made a substitution for the normal force and written mg plus Fsin Θ in its place. So we have Fcos Θ minus μ s times mg plus Fsin Θ equals 0 then distribute the coefficient of static friction into the bracket and then we end up with this line and we are solving for F remember so let's collect the two terms that contain a factor F together and then factor out the F so we have F times cos Θ minus μ ssin Θ and then take the other term to the right side so we'll add μ smg to both sides. Okay and then we can divide both sides by this bracket and we'll solve for F. So we have F is μ smg divided by cos Θ minus μ ssin Θ. So that's 0.1—which is the coefficient of static friction of ice on ice— times 45.0 kilograms—mass of the block— times 9.80 meters per second squared divided by cos of 25 degrees minus 0.1 times sin 25 which is 50 newtons. Then in part (b), we are asked well, given that this applied force remains the same after it starts moving, what will its acceleration be when it's moving? So we are going to look at equation 2 again; here's equation 2: Fcos Θ minus μF N equals 0 but the μ is gonna be substituted with the coefficient of kinetic friction now because the block is sliding and it's going to be accelerating so we don't have a 0 here anymore, we have an ma here now—this is Newton's second law— and our job is to solve for a so we divide both sides by m and we have the acceleration is Fcos Θ minus μ KF N over m but this normal force, we need to get rid of that by substituting it with this expression— mg plus Fsin Θ— and so we make that substitution here in place of F N and then at this point, you can plug in numbers I decided to make it a bit more clean looking by factoring out the F between this term and this one after multiplying by the negative μ K so that's why there's a minus there because it's being multiplied by this minus μ K. So we have F times cos Θ minus μ Ksin Θ minus μ Kmg all over m. So that's 51.039 newtons— using the unrounded answer from part (a); part (a) having only one significant figure because this coefficient of static friction has only one significant figure that's why I wrote 50 newtons but the unrounded answer is 51.039 newtons times cos 25 degrees minus 0.03— coefficient of kinetic friction— times sin 25 minus 0.03 times 45.0 kilograms times 9.80 meters per seconds squared divided by the mass gives us 0.7 meters per second squared.

Comments

Why do given the solution as 50 if it comes out as 51. Are we suppose to be rounding to the nearest tenth?

Yes, exactly, we're rounding to one significant figure. This is due to the of the coefficient of static friction, which has only one significant figure. When multiplying by a number with one sig. fig., the answer gets only one sig. fig. also.
All the best,
Shaun

I'm still unclear on how rounding to the nearest tenth would take the answer from 51.03 down to 50 rather than 51.

Thanks for the question @George Fingerwalker,
If we're talking about part (a), then we're not talking about rounding to the nearest tenth. Only the acceleration in part (b) is rounded to the nearest tenth, to 0.7 m/s20.7\textrm{ m/s}^2. In part (a) our calculation results in 51.03, as you mentioned. One of the factors by which we multiply to get 51.03 is the coefficient of friction, which is 0.1. The coefficient of friction has only one significant figure. The fact that the coefficient of friction is expressed with precision to the tenths place is not relevant, only its number of significant figures is relevant when multiplying. The result of multiplying several numbers needs to be rounded such that it has as many significant digits as the number with the fewest significant figures. The coefficient of friction has only one significant figure, so the result also needs to have only one significant figure. 51.03 expressed with only one significant figure is 50.
Hope this helps,
Shaun

The way they are teaching us about known coefficients is that they are actually exact numbers. All the constants, molar masses, are not affecting the # of sig figs in the answers my uni expects.
"Exact numbers have no uncertainty, and thus do not limit the number of significant figures in any calculation. We can regard an exact number as having an unlimited number of significant figures. "

Hi pansapinsa,
Thank you for the comment. I can totally understand how this is confusing. There is a place for the concept of "exact numbers" not affecting significant figures. In the formula for the circumference of a circle, for example, c=2πrc = 2 \pi r the factor 2 is exact. The factor 2 does not affect the number of significant figures in this calculation; it would not cause the answer to have only 1 significant figure, in other words. The factor 2 is not a measured value. When it comes to numbers such as the coefficient of friction, however, they are not exact, since they have been measured. The coefficient has been measured, and as such it has measurement error just like any other number that has been measured. Since this coefficient has only one significant figure, we must presume that this is the limit to its precision, otherwise it would be expressed as, for example, 0.1000, with some trailing zeros if it was more precise than 0.1.

It's possible that your uni is attempting to make the concept more simple for students by saying "ignore significant figures in values provided by the textbook". That approach doesn't pass scrutiny from the perspective of scientific integrity, but perhaps in their view there is a pedagogical benefit in attempting to bring attention to other physics concepts without becoming mired in error analysis. In your case, however, perhaps their simplification is paradoxically causing greater confusion.

Hope this helps, and good luck,
Shaun

No Q&As found for this question yet. How about you submit the first one?