Problem1
Section 16.1: Hooke's Law: Stress and Strain Revisited

Question

Fish are hung on a spring scale to determine their mass. (a) What is the force constant of the spring in such a scale if it the spring stretches 8.00 cm for a 10.0 kg load? (b) What is the mass of a fish that stretches the spring 5.50 cm? (c) How far apart are the half-kilogram marks on the scale?

Question by OpenStax is licensed under CC BY 4.0

Final Answer

  1. 1.23×103 N/m1.23\times 10^{3}\textrm{ N/m}
  2. 6.88 kg6.88 \textrm{ kg}
  3. 4.00 mm4.00 \textrm{ mm}

Solution video

4.6 (8)
750 views

Calculator Screenshots

Calculator screenshot

Comments

jsotosky·
Why are we using "g" as 9.81 now when we have been using it as 9.80?
Like
ShaunDychko·
Hi jsotosky, thank you for the question. Sorry for the inconsistency. The textbook often writes 9.80, but 9.81 is more often found elsewhere, such as [wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_acceleration#Comparative_gravities_of_the_Earth,_Sun,_Moon,_and_planets). It actually depends where on Earth you're located. $g$ is slightly greater at the poles, which are closer to the center of the Earth, whereas $g$ is less on the equator where the central bulge of the Earth makes you further from the center. All the best, Shaun
Like
Chelsea Nikkole Reece·
where did the .5 come from in part (c)
Like
Chelsea Nikkole Reece·
nvm I figured it out, sorry for bugging you.
Like
ShaunDychko·
I'm glad you figured it out, and no worries!
Like
Chelsea Nikkole Reece·
Is it possible to do this problem using the same formula, but taking the magnitude of (F) and (X) and dropping the negative before the (K)?
Like
ShaunDychko·
Yes, the calculation would work out to the same positive result. You can do this, and in Newton's Second Law questions (not Hook's Law questions like this) I usually take the magnitude of the forces and put negative signs in the equation, which is similar to the technique you're proposing of using magnitudes for displacement ($x$ in this equation) and changing the equation to suite (by removing the negative in front of the $k$). For my own way of thinking I would find your proposal confusing since I like the negative in the equation to remind me that the direction of the spring force is opposite to the direction of the displacement of the end of the spring, but if you find a technique that reliably gives you the correct answer and you can explain why it works then go ahead with it. All the best, Shaun
Like
NoOneReally·
You have the answer for part (b) as the answer for part (a).
Like
NoOneReally·
And you don't list part c in the answer set....
Like
ShaunDychko·
Thank you so much for spotting this oversight. I've added part (c) to the question and the answer. Best wishes with your studies! Shaun
Like